Optimal encoding of graph homomorphism energy using fuzzy information aggregation operators

Abstract The attributed relational graph matching (ARG) strategy is a well-known approach to object/pattern recognition. In the past for the parallel solution of ARG matching problem, an overall objective function was constructed using linearly weighted information aggregation function and one set of parameter values was chosen for all models by trial-and-error for the parameters in the function. In this paper, the compatibility between every pair of model and scene attributes is interpreted as a fuzzy value and subsequently the nonlinear fuzzy information aggregation operators are used to fuse the information captured in the chosen attributes. To learn the parameters in the fuzzy information aggregation operators, the “learning from samples” strategy is used. The learning of weight parameters is formulated as an optimisation problem and solved using the gradient projection algorithm based learning procedure. The learning procedure implicitly evaluates ambiguity, robustness and discriminatory power of the relational attributes chosen for graph matching and assigns weights appropriately to the chosen attributes. The learning procedure also enables us to compute a distinct set of optimal parameters for every model to reflect the characteristics of the model so that the homomorphic ARG matching problem can be optimally encoded in the energy function for the model. Experimental results are presented to illustrate effectiveness and necessity of the parameter estimation and learning procedures.

[1]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[2]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Decisions and evaluations by hierarchical aggregation of information , 1983 .

[3]  Eam Khwang Teoh,et al.  Self-organizing Hopfield network for attributed relational graph matching , 1995, Image Vis. Comput..

[4]  Bernd Radig,et al.  Image sequence analysis using relational structures , 1984, Pattern Recognit..

[5]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  HYPER: A New Approach for the Recognition and Positioning of Two-Dimensional Objects , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Malcolm C. Harrison,et al.  An analysis of four uncertainty calculi , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  Eam Khwang Teoh,et al.  Pattern recognition by homomorphic graph matching using Hopfield neural networks , 1995, Image Vis. Comput..

[8]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[9]  Thomas C. Henderson,et al.  CAGD-Based Computer Vision , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  A model of inexact reasoning in medicine , 1990 .

[11]  Didier Dubois,et al.  A class of fuzzy measures based on triangular norms , 1982 .

[12]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  Generalized means as model of compensative connectives , 1984 .

[13]  Joonwhoan Lee,et al.  Fuzzy-set-based hierarchical networks for information fusion in computer vision , 1992, Neural Networks.

[14]  Steven Gold,et al.  A Graduated Assignment Algorithm for Graph Matching , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Didier Dubois,et al.  A review of fuzzy set aggregation connectives , 1985, Inf. Sci..

[16]  William Grimson,et al.  Object recognition by computer - the role of geometric constraints , 1991 .

[17]  David G. Luenberger,et al.  Linear and nonlinear programming , 1984 .

[18]  Eam Khwang Teoh,et al.  Pattern recognition by graph matching using the Potts MFT neural networks , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[19]  M. Mizumoto Pictorial representations of fuzzy connectives, Part II: cases of compensatory operators and self-dual operators , 1989 .

[20]  Ramesh C. Jain,et al.  Invariant surface characteristics for 3D object recognition in range images , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[21]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Matching: Invariant to translations, rotations and scale changes , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[22]  F. R. A. Hopgood,et al.  Machine Intelligence 5 , 1971, The Mathematical Gazette.

[23]  Marcello Pelillo,et al.  Learning Compatibility Coefficients for Relaxation Labeling Processes , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[24]  Sang Uk Lee,et al.  On the color image segmentation algorithm based on the thresholding and the fuzzy c-means techniques , 1990, Pattern Recognit..

[25]  Richard A. Volz,et al.  Recognizing Partially Occluded Parts , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[26]  Donald Michie,et al.  Machine Intelligence 7 , 1975 .

[27]  Alain Hillion,et al.  Fuzzy random fields and unsupervised image segmentation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Donald Michie,et al.  Machine intelligence 11 , 1988 .

[29]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Pattern recognition : a statistical approach , 1982 .

[30]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information , 1988 .

[31]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[32]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  A New Method for Mapping Optimization Problems Onto Neural Networks , 1989, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[33]  Donald Michie,et al.  Machine Intelligence 4 , 1970 .