Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning

The purpose of the two studies reported here wos to develop an integrated model of the scientific reasoning process. Subjects were placed in a simulated scientific discovery context by first teaching them how to use an electronic device and then asking them to discover how a hitherto unencountered function worked. To do this task. subjects had to formulate hypotheses bas’ed on their prior knowledge, conduct experiments, and evaluate the results of their experiments. In t,he first study, using 20 adult subjects, we identified two main strategies that subjects used to generate new hypotheses. One strategy was to scorch memory and the other was to generalize from the results of previous experiments. We described the former group as searching an hypothesis space, and the latter as searching on experiment space. In a second study, with 10 adults, we investigated how subjects search the hypothesis space by instructing them to state all the hypotheses that they could think of prior to conducting any experiments. Following this phase, subjects were then allowed to conduct experiments. Subjects who could not think of the correct rule in the hypothesis generation phase discovered the correct rule only by generalizing from the results of experiments in the experimentol phase. Both studies provide support for the view that scientific reasoning can be characterized as search in two problem spaces. By extending Simon and Lea’s (1974) Generalized Rule Inducer, we present a general model of Scientific Discovery as Dual Search (SDDS) that shows how search in two problem spaces (an hypothesis space and an experiment space) shapes hypothesis generation, experimental design, and the evaluation of hypotheses. The model also shows how these processes interact with each other. Finally, we interpret earlier findings about the psychology of scientific reasoning In terms of the SDDS model.

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. , 1974 .

[2]  R. Case.  Structures and strictures: Some functional limitations on the course of cognitive growth. , 1974 .

[3]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Consequences of Confirmation and Disconfirmation in a Simulated Research Environment , 1978 .

[4]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  The Subjective Side of Science , 1969 .

[5]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Judging probable cause. , 1986 .

[6]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Processes of Scientific Discovery: The Strategy of Experimentation , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  David Klahr,et al.  Instructionless Learning about a Complex Device: The Paradigm and Observations , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[8]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[9]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Concept learning as a function of form of internal structure , 1963 .

[10]  R. Siegler,et al.  Acquisition of formal scientific reasoning by 10- and 13-year-olds: Designing a factorial experiment. , 1975 .

[11]  E. Phelps,et al.  The development of problem-solving strategies. , 1982, Advances in child development and behavior.

[12]  B. Inhelder,et al.  If you want to get ahead, get a theory , 1975, Cognition.

[13]  N. Wetherick,et al.  Eliminative and Enumerative Behaviour in a Conceptual Task , 1962 .

[14]  B. Ross.  Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Barr and Feigenbaum Edward A. Avron,et al.  The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence , 1981 .

[16]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[17]  H. Penny Nii,et al.  The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence , 1982 .

[18]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Scientific discovery: compulalional explorations of the creative process , 1987 .

[19]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  How the possibility of error affects falsification on a task that models scientific problem solving , 1986 .

[20]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[21]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[22]  J. Kagan.  The concept of identification. , 1958, Psychological review.

[23]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  Mathematical theory of concept identification. , 1959, Psychological review.

[24]  R. Shepard,et al.  Learning and memorization of classifications. , 1961 .

[25]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Concepts and concept formation. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  James Bryant Conant,et al.  Two modes of thought : my encounters with science and education , 1964 .

[27]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Disconfirmation and Dual Hypotheses on a more Difficult version of Wason's 2–4–6 Task , 1987 .

[28]  M. McCloskey,et al.  The development of beliefs about falling objects , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Confirmation Bias in a Simulated Research Environment: An Experimental Study of Scientific Inference , 1977 .

[30]  M. Gorman,et al.  A Comparison of Disconfirmatory, Confirmatory and Control Strategies on Wason's 2–4–6 Task , 1984 .

[31]  R. Stavy,et al.  1 – U-Shaped Behavioral Growth in Ratio Comparisons1 , 1982 .

[32]  M. McCloskey.  Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[33]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  An Analysis of Generalization as a Search Problem , 1979, IJCAI.

[34]  P. Wason.  Problem solving and reasoning. , 1971, British medical bulletin.

[35]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[36]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  H. Simon,et al.  The functional equivalence of problem solving skills , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[39]  H. Eysenck.  THINKING , 1958 .

[40]  P. Wason.  On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task , 1960 .

[41]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Models of Discovery , 1978 .

[42]  W. R. Garner.  Concept Learning: An Information- Processing Problem , 1964 .

[43]  M. Levine.  Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[45]  Allen Newell,et al.  Elements of a theory of human problem solving. , 1958 .

[46]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Models of Mental Strategies in Process Plant Diagnosis , 1981 .

[47]  M. Scheerer,et al.  Problem Solving , 1967, Nature.

[48]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  The subjective side of science : Mitroff, Ian I., Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974, 329 pp., $11.50 , 1976 .

[49]  David D. Tukey.  A Philosophical and Empirical Analysis of Subjects’ Modes of Inquiry in Wason's 2–4–6 Task , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[50]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  THE MIND'S EYE IN CHESS , 1988 .

[52]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Introduction to mathematical psychology , 1970 .

[53]  G. Wallas.  The art of thought , 1926 .

[54]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Revision of beliefs when a hypothesis is eliminated from consideration. , 1985 .

[55]  Ryan D. Tweney,et al.  Strategies of Rule Discovery in an Inference Task , 1980 .

[56]  D. O'brien,et al.  Evaluations of Causal and Conditional Hypotheses , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[57]  D. Klahr,et al.  Formal assessment of problem-solving and planning processes in preschool children , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  J L Santa,et al.  Thinking and Concept Attainment , 1975 .

[59]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[60]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[61]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[62]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[63]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Process models and stochastic theories of simple concept formation , 1967 .

[64]  P. C. Wason.  Reply to Wetherick , 1962 .

[65]  R. Siegler.  The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. , 1987 .

[66]  J. Klayman,et al.  Hypothesis testing in rule discovery: Strategy, structure, and content. , 1989 .

[67]  Martin Stacey,et al.  Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes , 1988 .