Coping with Real-World Challenges in Real-Time Urban Traffic Control

In urban road networks, the use of real-time adaptive traffic signal control systems faces two typical challenges. First, various sources of uncertainty and disturbance can significantly degrade the accuracy of real-time flow predictions. Second, the optimization of vehicle flows must also give active attention to other transportation modes such as bus transit and pedestrian flows. In this paper, these challenges are investigated in the context of a recently implemented system called SURTRAC (Scalable URban TRAffic Control), which has now been running continuously in an actual urban environment for more than one year. SURTRAC takes a decentralized, schedule-driven approach to real-time traffic control and its design aims at urban (grid-like) networks with multiple, completing dominant flows that shift through the day. Motivated by observations of the system in operation, several strategies are proposed for strengthening the basic SURTRAC algorithm to better deal with real-world uncertainties and disruptive events, as well as multi-modal traffic demands. We evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies using both simulations and analysis of data collected from the pilot deployment.

[1]  Henry X. Liu,et al.  Real-time queue length estimation for congested signalized intersections , 2009 .

[2]  Stephen F. Smith,et al.  SURTRAC: Scalable Urban Traffic Control , 2013 .

[3]  P. Varaiya,et al.  Components of Congestion: Delay from Incidents, Special Events, Lane Closures, Weather, Potential Ramp Metering Gain, and Excess Demand , 2006 .

[4]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Performance Measures for Adaptive Signal Control: Case Study of System-in-the-Loop Simulation , 2012 .

[5]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Evaluation of the Accuracy of Stop Bar Video Vehicle Detection at Signalized Intersections , 2005 .

[6]  Monica Gentili,et al.  Locating sensors on traffic networks: Models, challenges and research opportunities , 2012 .

[7]  Bruce Hellinga,et al.  Analytical Method for Estimating the Impact of Transit Signal Priority on Vehicle Delay , 2011 .

[8]  Stephen F. Smith,et al.  Schedule-Driven Coordination for Real-Time Traffic Network Control , 2012, ICAPS.

[9]  Aleksandar Stevanovic,et al.  Adaptive Traffic Control Systems: Domestic and Foreign State of Practice , 2010 .

[10]  Werner Kraus,et al.  Simultaneous control of traffic lights and bus departure for priority operation , 2010 .

[11]  Jan Van Damme,et al.  Project scheduling under uncertainty survey and research potentials , 2002 .

[12]  Sam Yagar,et al.  A PROCEDURE FOR REAL-TIME SIGNAL CONTROL THAT CONSIDERS TRANSIT INTERFERENCE AND PRIORITY , 1994 .

[13]  Manuel G. Romana,et al.  Bus Dwell-Time Model of Main Urban Route Stops , 2012 .

[14]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Input–Output and Hybrid Techniques for Real-Time Prediction of Delay and Maximum Queue Length at Signalized Intersections , 2007 .

[15]  Stephen F. Smith,et al.  Schedule-driven intersection control , 2012 .

[16]  Peter Koonce,et al.  Statistical Study of the Impact of Adaptive Traffic Signal Control on Traffic and Transit Performance , 2013 .

[17]  Kenneth L Head,et al.  EVENT-BASED SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC FLOW PREDICTION MODEL , 1995 .

[18]  Jean-Loup Farges,et al.  Decentralization vs Hierarchy in Optimal Traffic Control , 1987 .

[19]  Theodore Anton Petritsch,et al.  Level-of-Service Model for Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections , 2005 .

[20]  P. Vedagiri,et al.  Modeling Pedestrian Delay and Level of Service at Signalized Intersection Crosswalks under Mixed Traffic Conditions , 2013 .

[21]  Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.  A REAL-TIME TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM: ARCHITECTURE, ALGORITHMS, AND ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[22]  Todd Litman,et al.  America Needs Complete Streets , 2011 .

[23]  Michael P Dixon,et al.  Detection of Stop Bar Traffic Flow State , 2011 .

[24]  Christopher M. Monsere,et al.  Testing Strategies to Reduce Pedestrian Delay at Signalized Intersections: A Pilot Study in Portland, Oregon , 2013 .