Minimum Variance Approaches to Ultrasound Pixel-Based Beamforming

We analyze the principles underlying minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamforming in order to integrate it into a pixel-based algorithm. There is a challenge posed by the low echo signal-to-noise ratio (eSNR) when calculating beamformer contributions at pixels far away from the beam centreline. Together with the well-known scarcity of samples for covariance matrix estimation, this reduces the beamformer performance and degrades the image quality. To address this challenge, we implement the MVDR algorithm in two different ways. First, we develop the conventional minimum variance pixel-based (MVPB) beamformer that performs the MVDR after the pixel-based superposition step. This involves a combination of methods in the literature, extended over multiple transmits to increase the eSNR. Then we propose the coherent MVPB beamformer, where the MVDR is applied to data within individual transmits. Based on pressure field analysis, we develop new algorithms to improve the data alignment and matrix estimation, and hence overcome the low-eSNR issue. The methods are demonstrated on data acquired with an ultrasound open platform. The results show the coherent MVPB beamformer substantially outperforms the conventional MVPB in a series of experiments, including phantom and in vivo studies. Compared to the unified pixel-based beamformer, the newest delay-and-sum algorithm in [1], the coherent MVPB performs well on regions that conform to the diffuse scattering assumptions on which the minimum variance principles are based. It produces less good results for parts of the image that are dominated by specular reflections.

[1]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[2]  Zvi Friedman,et al.  Multi-line acquisition with minimum variance beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[3]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Wiener beamforming and the coherence factor in ultrasound imaging , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  A. Dallai,et al.  ULA-OP: an advanced open platform for ultrasound research , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  J.A. Jensen,et al.  Ultrasound research scanner for real-time synthetic aperture data acquisition , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  W.F. Walker,et al.  A constrained adaptive beamformer for medical ultrasound: initial results , 2002, 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings..

[7]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  On spatial smoothing for direction-of-arrival estimation of coherent signals , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[8]  A. Austeng,et al.  Adaptive Beamforming Applied to Medical Ultrasound Imaging , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  J. Walkup,et al.  Statistical optics , 1986, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[10]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[11]  M. Skolnik,et al.  Introduction to Radar Systems , 2021, Advances in Adaptive Radar Detection and Range Estimation.

[12]  M.F. Insana,et al.  Backscatter coefficient estimation using array transducers , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  Alle-Jan van der Veen,et al.  Radio-astronomical imaging in the presence of strong radio interference , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[15]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Objective Assessment of Sonographic Quality I: Task Information , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Renbiao Wu,et al.  Time-delay- and time-reversal-based robust capon beamformers for ultrasound imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Francois Vignon,et al.  Capon beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging with focused beams , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  G. Farhat,et al.  Diagnostic ultrasound Imaging : Inside out , 2004 .

[19]  Dong-Lai Liu,et al.  About the application of the van Cittert-Zernike theorem in ultrasonic imaging , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  A Mahloojifar,et al.  Contrast enhancement and robustness improvement of adaptive ultrasound imaging using forward-backward minimum variance beamforming , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[22]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Eigenspace Based Minimum Variance Beamforming Applied to Ultrasound Imaging of Acoustically Hard Tissues , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  F. Gran,et al.  Broadband minimum variance beamforming for ultrasound imaging , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  SNR-dependent coherence-based adaptive imaging for high-frame-rate ultrasonic and photoacoustic imaging , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[26]  M. Bae,et al.  A study of synthetic-aperture imaging with virtual source elements in B-mode ultrasound imaging systems. , 2000, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control.

[27]  Richard W. Prager,et al.  High-Resolution Ultrasound Imaging With Unified Pixel-Based Beamforming , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Objective Assessment of Sonographic: Quality II Acquisition Information Spectrum , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Magali Sasso,et al.  Medical ultrasound imaging using the fully adaptive beamformer , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[30]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[31]  A. Austeng,et al.  Benefits of minimum-variance beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[32]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory , 2002 .

[33]  F. Dunn,et al.  Letter: Correlation of echographic visualizability of tissue with biological composition and physiological state. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Sergiy A. Vorobyov,et al.  Adaptive and Robust Beamforming , 2014 .

[35]  K. Kristoffersen,et al.  Parallel beamforming using synthetic transmit beams , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.